All Things Appealing and Nice
Wednesday, April 2, 2014
Wedding Night by Sophie Kinsella: A review
Here we go! A review of Sophie Kinsella's book Wedding Night.
I was pretty excited for this book. Kinsella usually has some really nice, lighthearted reads that are funny at times and all in all make for great chick-lit on a nice Friday evening. However, I have to say that I didn't quite like Wedding Night as much as some of Kinsella's previous works. It seemed to lack a certain charm and quirkiness instead bordering near chaos and a giant rush. Of course I acknowledge that the books is about a rather chaotic situation and the rush to stop the consummating of Lottie's marriage but it felt like too large of a hurry. Reading it left me rather impatient for the ending to play out so I could finally relax.
The first thing I will remark on is the large cast of main characters. In total there was six: Lotti, Lucran, Ben, Richard, Noah, and Fliss, along with some other sub characters sprinkled in the plot. I found this abundance of characters to be frankly too much. There were so many characters with their parts to play running in this novel at the same time that it was frankly chaotic. I felt no one's character ever had a chance to fully develop.
Now to specifics:
Lottie and Richard along with Lottie and Ben's relationship both heavily depended on a back story. Their interactions were very fast and dramatic, never really building the character up instead seemingly stating: this is the character and this is what she/he does. I guess because of this lack of built foundation in the actual course of the story I found Lottie to be the most stupid, idiotic, shallow, psycho character I've ever dealt with. She was just a bloody mess from the beginning of the book to the end. One moment super happy the another- super depressed. It was like she suffered bipolar disorder or severe mood swings all through out the novel. I believe it is the reason that this novel was a chick lit romance that she actually did end up with Richard and that Richard still loved her. If this book was in any way slightly more realistic I would bet money that Richard be running far, far, far away from the psychotic Lottie.
Lottie and Ben's relationship also heavily depended on their back story. Their relationship in the book can also be summed up very simply: sex. That was all they wanted to do and all they never accomplished. It was simply idiotic.
I found Fliss and Locran's relationship to be slightly more charming and closer in characteristic the books Kinsella has previously written. Their relationship was better demonstrated in the course of the plot and gave them better connections. Fliss and Lorcan are very clearly the more logical and grounded characters in the book. I believe Kinsella purposely did such a large contrast between her pairings in this books of Fliss and Locran vs Lottie and Ben/Richard and it was a good and classic idea; however, she did not seem to execute either of the pairings successfully thus I found them both to be rather bland and unsuccessfully developed.
Fliss also had a back story involving a horrid ex-husband that she is still a mist working on the divorce with and an adorable son named Noah. This part of the story could have definitely been expanded. There was only one conversation between Fliss and her ex-husband but I found it to be interesting. Throughout the whole book I kept on waiting for a confrontation between Fliss and her ex but it never happened. Instead Fliss just threw her USB with all her divorce hate in to the ocean. That was a great way of demonstrating letting go but I still wanted a confrontation for the sake of dramatics. I felt that would have played out in Wedding Night if there were less characters and the story was more centralized and focused.
Wedding Night was not a bad book. It just wasn't as good, to me, as Kinsella's previous works. It is like one of those romantic comedy movies that make you feel fuzzy and happy at the end of it, yet at the same time, you gain nothing from it.
I can almost parallel Wedding Night to Disney's Frozen. They both featured great ideas plot wise and had fun characters. However the too large cast of characters dried the plot and didn't allow for as much character development as desired to make the story better. It was an enjoyable read so I would recommend a read. However, as I stated before, it leaves you feeling rushed and slightly overwhelmed.
Sunday, March 30, 2014
Salvage by Alexandra Duncan: ARC Review *Spoilers
*badly edited as it is a rant.
Bad book. Bad, bad, boring book. May I say this was a book of cliches? It certainly, undoubtedly was. It was highly, highly predictable throughout and I almost couldn't bring myself to finish it. I, at the end, just flipped around in it till I reached the end, closed it, and then contemplated how this book could have been such a large, drastic waste of words, ink, and effort. Poor, poor trees. Your remains have been wasted.
Ava, the main character was plain irritating to me. I guess , maybe, she was created to be as she was so the author could emphasize the way she was raised and the culture she was born into but if that was the case, the author took it too far. I found Ava to be indecisive, and weak- a blob of moving goo. I understand that Ava has grown up and was raised under a male dominated society so her meekness is expected. However, she never seems to grasp the full idiocy of her actions and situation.
The number one thing that irritated me was he immediate love for (whatever his name was) Luck. Basically the story line/ romance between them flows along the lines of this:
1. Boy meets Girl
2. Boy is strange and different to Girl exposing her to new ideas and things
3. Boy and Girl are at marriageable age
4. Boy and Girl meet again suddenly realizing the love each other with no large prior romance or connection
5. Boy and Girl are one same ship and Girl is to be married
6. Boy and Girl believe they are to be the new married couple
7. Boy and Girl goes "have fun" (Girl no longer a virgin if you didn't get that)
Now of course do to the cliche nature of this story Ava was not actually supposed to marry the boy thus they both screwed up big time. All in short, Ava and Luck both got into very big trouble and Ava was presumed to be sentenced to be executed due to her sin before being saved by one of the widows on the ship who took sympathy. Boom, widow is captured, girl escapes and is girl is once again alone.
Basically that is the flow of the story.
Oh, and I have to get to the best part. So after Ava falls from the sky and is on earth she becomes all depressed and stuff and is taken care of this really nice family. Of course though, her first thought is that: I might be having Luck's child!, and she becomes super excited, loving, and hopeful. Really girl? You've met him a few times, you screw around with him and gets yourself kicked off your home probably forever (good thing too), and after all this all you feel is that I might be pregnant as you've had no period due to post traumatic stress and recovery? Think Child! I can't stand your idiocy.
Also, another thing that irked me was that I never exactly knew how to picture her. In her description she is described as darker than the other women on her ship and has dark black hair which was dyed auburn to conform with all the other women on the ship. I assumed that her ethnicity was Indian due to the fact her aunt was from Mumbai and so was her Grandfather (assumed). However, once she lands on earth, it is immediately said that Ava is paler than the other people. I can still go with Indian was there are skin tone differences and she is most likely pretty diluted in blood due to her bloodline with the people on the ship. So you'd assume that she was Indian in culture somewhere right? Well then the cover completely contradicts everything. I know you're never supposed to judge by the cover but if you're going to place a damsel in distress who's depiction largely resembles Ava, I'm going to assume its her. Now the girl on the cover is clearly Caucasian as far as I can tell. Stop book! Your description and cover is very confusing. May you please stay consistent?
I guess that the only part of this book that was okay-ish was the fact that she did not go back and be all happily married with Luck, instead choosing to remain on her as she has "changed". Congrats Ava, you've moved one. So yes, that was the only main part that I kind of liked in this book with a horrendously annoying protagonist.
I don't believe I'd recommend this book to anyone. But if you're really desperate for a read that guarantees frustration I'd say go for it! (note the sarcasm). As you can tell I'm pretty biased to not like this book but if you must give it a try and see if you note differently.
Last Thought: I read this book in its ARC form (advanced reader's copy) so it might have changed a little for the better in its official publication process. However, though an ARC copy the amount of grammatical errors, spelling errors, and perhaps formatting errors was appalling. I don't believe I've ever seen such a badly edited ARC. I found it slighly insulting they would use such a bad copy and print it into an Arc. It was hard and confusing to read. Alright, rants over.
*Also note the use of "So". The author keeps on saying "So" and Ava regards herself as the so girl. This was super confusing and I don't believe they never explained what it was in the book? The might have but I sped read. I'm hoping this is fixed or was supposed to be substituted for something else, Idk, but I was very confused with it.
Saturday, March 29, 2014
The Serpent of Germany: A research paper on the Rhetoric of Joseph Goebbels
The Serpent of
Germany
A single word is power; a sentence
is a trap; a speech is propaganda. Humans, by nature, are creatures ruled more
so by emotion than logic. They are
easily swayed by passions making their invention of speech their own
damnation. Blunt force easily fuels
hate, while sweetly, venomous words arouse blind seduction, thus making rhetoric
the ideal tool in the eternal power struggle of the world. Skill in the art of rhetoric was what allowed
Goebbels to rise to the limelight he desired (Goebbels: The Man Who Created
Hitler pg 15). With it, he came to
grasp Germany in his palm, and to dominate her people. Goebbels was not a superman-like character; instead,
he was a man that was once nicknamed "Little Joe": ugly and club
footed (Goebbels: The Man Who Created Hitler pg 15). However, his physical appearance did not
falter his run at power. He used his
words to maintain a greater power with intelligence than ever achievable by
blunt force. At the dawn of World War
II, Goebbels recognized the fact that Germany was a nation that had fallen from
grace after its previous humiliating defeat from World War I. It is at this point that Goebbels began his
assent to power, grasping his nation's shame as golden opportunity. He offered his nation a renewed sense of
confidence, uplifting her fallen ego with words dripping with honey. Joseph Goebbels sold a cycle of German
superiority to the people, appealing to honor and moral duty in Nazi
propaganda, exploiting the people's humiliation from Germany's defeat in World
War I.
Goebbels plays off the people's shame
from World War I to bind them to national patriotism, enforcing German
superiority. He conjures imagery with
the title of his speech: "Children with their Hands Chopped Off," to emphasize
German resilience. Germany has matured: no
longer an innocent child but a wise and strong nation. Goebbels immediately hits his audience hard
with shame from its previous defeat in World War I. He declares that "the results were
catastrophic. Germany was robbed of its
honor and its land," that "[Germany] [was] disarmed and robbed of [its]
merchant fleet and navy, and [its] colonies" ("Children with their
Hands Chopped Off" par 11). His
retrospection of Germany's previous humiliating defeat pains and tugs at his
audience's pathos as a painted image of Germany's fall from glory. This blow of humiliation sets the audience up
to willing accept any words of comfort to pacify its shame, making it now
easily influenced. Goebbels then offers
solace to his newly complacent and ashamed audience declaring that Germany's
defeat "did have one good result": the loss of blind trust and innocence
("Children with their Hands Chopped Off" par 12). Now Germany is no longer an innocent fool:
[Germany] has learned much from the past. Above all,
it has learned never to trust a treacherous foe. This lesson is deep in our
bones ("Morale as a Decisive Factor in War" par 14).
This excuse, of
an evident loss of trust, is used by Goebbels as the reason Germany has been
able to realize its true potential and strength. The hindrance of the "foe" has been
realized and the hard lesson of trust learned, thus "[Germany] is not as defenseless
today as [it] once [was]. Today [it has]
the most powerful army in the world" ("Children with their Hands
Chopped Off" par 17). Goebbels's
juxtaposition of "defenseless" in comparison to "powerful"
aids to further arouse national pride. In being beaten and shamed, Germany has realized
its true potential and strength, finally maturing while the rest of the world
has suffered lassitude and festered from basking in their arrogant glory of
earlier victory.
Goebbels's radiance of confidence in
his words erases doubt and offers reassurance to the people, compelling them to
believe and remain faithful to Nazi propaganda.
He ardently states "someone once said that he did not know which
people could be beaten to death, but he did know the German people had to be
beaten to life" (Resistance at Any Price" par 6). This juxtaposition offers a glorification of
the German people that rings with his audience: Germany only gains strength
from enemy assault, never faltering. These
words infuse his audience with passion for his propaganda. It feeds the people the will to rise from the
ashes of Germany's defeat in World War I and offers condolence for the necessity
of the previous failure for the rise of the greater now. He thus incorporates past failure as part of
the long road to a destined glory. Goebbels
also forces an idealization upon the German people preaching "whatever may
come, we will stand upright through all the storms, working and fighting" ("The
Higher Law" par 9). Here, hasty
generalization asserts the fact the whole of the German nation is firm in faith
of the Reich's cause. This centralization
of confidence calls for mass conformity of the German citizens whose conformed
faith feeds the propaganda in a relentless cycle. Knowing this key strategy, Goebbels constantly
feeds the flames of the undying German spirit: "Never will we surrender
our right to live in freedom and dignity as we ourselves wish" ("The
Higher Law" par 9). He then offers
another juxtaposition between the wants of the singular to his faith in the
nation. This juxtaposition states that
want of the singular to surrender now and be relieved of his current state of suffering;
yet, the singular will never surrender due to his faith that "final
victory will be ours. It will come
through tears and blood, but it will justify all the sacrifices we have
made" ("Resistance at Any Price" par 12). His chosen diction: tears and blood, ties
closely to the moral ideal of sacrifice of the singular for the all. Goebbels's words have turned his audience
into gluttons, fattened from the fantasy
of high morality and ideals. His strong appeal
to inborn moral obligation: the ethos of his audience, grasps his people in a hypnosis
of moral propaganda.
Furthermore, to emphasize the innate
honor of Germany, Goebbels paints a picture of shining morality, enforcing the
idea the Germany is above the brutality of the "uneducated" allies allowing
the people to gain a sense personal superiority. His speeches highly moral ideals that are
stated as a innate feature of the German propaganda. His words feature ideals like: "Peace
through victory! That is our slogan."
and "The truth is always stronger than the lie" ("Christmas
1941" par 15) ("The Racial Question and World Propaganda" par 27). These ideas are set in moral code applying to
any culture and his clear statement of these ideas in German propaganda
reassures the people's ethos and draws them in.
When one is told that the cause he is fighting for is definitely and
unarguably for a moral and good cause, a bond is forged within the soul that is
hard to break. Goebbels also brings to
emphasis of the honor of German warfare declaring how "[he] saw German
soldiers giving bread and sausages to hungry French women and children, and
gasoline to refugees to enable them to return home as soon as possible" ("The
Jews are Guilty" par 10). The
pleasantness of this honorable picture appeals to the pathos of the people
drawing them further in towards the German cause. However, using strategic climatic phrasing, Goebbels
does not increase to mention more pleasant German deeds. Instead he turns his words to the affects of
the high morality of the deeds of these German Soldiers. He follows with the idea that the enemy
victims, after receiving German aid and care that allows them to return to
safety, goes home only " to spread at least some of their hatred against
the Reich" ("The Jews are Guilty" par 10). This scenario of how "thanks" is
offered to the German soldier from
offers of aid stimulates outrage in the morality of German citizens. This blatant "betrayal" of good
intentions easily allowed Goebbels to draw increasing numbers of "moral"
people to Nazi Propaganda.
Goebbels, also, uses the allies
destruction of German cultural monuments to create a mutual sense of anger and
superiority among the German people. Goebbels
makes a clear statement regarding the reasons behind the avid destruction of
German monuments by enemy forces:
German or Italian cultural centers that were built
over centuries were reduced to soot and ashes in brief hours...this is evidence
of an historical inferiority complex that wants to destroy what the enemy is
incapable of producing himself ("Immortal German Culture" par 4).
He evokes
resentment and demonization of the allies due to their spiteful, jealous
destruction. Goebbels draws the inference
that in seeking to destroy German arts the enemy seeks to destroy the German
spirit, for "not only the buildings of our cities and cathedrals and
cultural monuments of Europe are falling into ruins, but also a whole
world" ("The World Crisis" par 8). The pathos of his audience is affected from
this statement as innate honor forces them to stand even taller against the
assault. Catharsis, from the unnecessary and tragic loss of irreplaceable
national treasures, also rallies the people in a rage that feeds Nazi
propaganda's fire. However, pride is generated
alongside rage by Goebbels's careful mention of destruction from envy. This pride is fed to the German people by the
hasty generalization that German art is superior to the point of purposeful destruction
by savage enemies, who destroy what they, themselves, cannot create:
Is it not interesting that the English leadership
has destroyed dozens of German theaters, while England itself does not have
even a single serious theater? And the Americans are not even worth mentioning ("Immortal
German Culture" par 5).
Goebbels's sarcastic
insult to the meagerness of artistic achievements of Germany's assaulters
rouses national pride. He draws a clear juxtaposition
between "[Germany's] eternal artistic accomplishments stand against
skyscrapers, cars, and refrigerators"; it is a comparison of aged,
aesthetic beauty verses cold, gray metal ("Immortal German Culture"
par 4). This juxtaposition of
unparalleled German art and its targeted destruction, caused by jealous spite,
allows Goebbels to play his people's ego and maintain a lasting grip on his
nation.
In all his speeches, Goebbels's
words ring that constant faith in German propaganda will insure all of Germany
an inevitably bright future. This clear
demand of faith in Germany is demonstrated in Goebbels's speech "The Year
2000" In this speech, Goebbels
takes a clearly retrospective view of the world, talking of it from the point
of view of the future. Though his predictions
could easily be called a bluff, Goebbels is careful to state "no one can
predict the distant future" ("The Year 2000" par 2). Instead, The careful phrasing of Goebbels's
words allows him to keep himself from being viewed as idealistic, instead,
factual as he states "there are some facts and possibilities that are
clear over the coming fifty years" ("The Year 2000" par 2). Goebbels's optimistic prediction creates the
future of the year 2000 to be an utopia for the German nation, drawing the
people's pathos in towards an idealized peace.
Goebbels use the idea of an utopia to bind the people's faith, stating
that "[they]...like Atlas carry the weight of the world on [their] shoulders
and [should] not doubt" ("The Year 2000" par 10). His statement appeals to the people's pathos
and logos, as he offers them a personal and societal award, for their actions
and faith in his propaganda will help to create an ideal utopia for
Germany. To further simple necessity of
faith to his audience, Goebbels makes a return to confidence:
Without wavering we know that a nation of brave men
and sacrificing women, with an obedient and devoted youth, a nation that is
risking its very existence in fighting for freedom, will gain it ("Morale
as a Decisive Factor in War" par 14).
Here, Goebbels
offers the idea faith will earn the people's ideal utopia; he becomes a
propaganda salesman. This blatant appeal
to pathos: the guarantee of a definite personal benefit, plays on the human
nature of greed and acts as a binding glue connecting him to his audience.
Through the whole course of World
War II, Josef Goebbels was able to hold the German population under a hypnosis
of faith and manipulation. Like the
biblical serpent of Adam and Eve, he captured Germany in a psychotic frenzy and
fed it with visions of superiority and honor.
Goebbels raised Germany's ego from its pit of shame, caused by defeat in
World War I, offering "redemption".
He was the serpent of Germany: a short, ugly man whose beauty in
language manipulated a nation to march under his hand. To hold well strung words at the tip of one's
tongue offers more power ever attainable by brute force. Words can reach out and consume one's soul with
unknown- silent- manipulation. The true
power holder is not one that harbors "high" morals of the god-like
Clark Kent but one who can manipulate submission to an unaware audience.
Works Cited
Goebbels, Joseph. "Children with
their Hands Chopped Off." Das Reich,
24 June 1939.
Goebbels, Joseph. "Christmas,
1941." Germany. 24 December 1941.
Goebbels, Joseph. "The Higher
Law." Das Reich, 24 September
1944.
Goebbels, Joseph. "Immortal German
Culture." 7th German Art Exhibition. Germany. 26 June 1943.
Goebbels, Joseph. "The Jews are Guilty."
Das Reich, 26 November 1941.
Goebbels, Joseph. "Morale as a Decisive Factor
in War." Das Reich, 7 August
1943.
Goebbels, Joseph. "The Racial Question and
World Propaganda." Nuremberg Rally. Germany.1933.
Goebbels, Joseph. "Resistance at
Any Price." Das Reich, 22 April
1945
Goebbels, Joseph. "The World
Crisis." Das Reich, 17 December
1944.
Goebbels, Joseph. "The Year
2000." Das Reich, 25 February
1945.
Reimann Victor. Goebbels: The man who created
Hitler. Garden City, New York: Doubleday and Company INC, 1976.
Works Consulted
Goebbels, Joseph. "Churchill's
Trick." Das Reich, 1 March 1942.
Goebbels, Joseph. "German Women."
Women's Exhibition. Berlin. 18 March 1933.
Goebbels, Joseph. "Youth and the
War." Germany. 29 September
1940.
Holocaust Encyclopedia. United States
Holocaust Memorial Museum. 6 January, 2011.
http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007429
Knopp, Guido. Hitler's Henchmen. Phoenix
Mill, Thrupp-Shroud-Gloucestershire: Sutton Publishing Limited, 2000.
Trueman, Chis. History Learning Site. 21
April 2012.
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/treaty_of_versailles.htm
Friday, March 21, 2014
White Hot Kiss by Jennifer L. Armentrout: ARC Review *Spoilers
This book! I never expected it to like it but I did! It was just that the first reaction I had to White Hot Kiss was: "Well that cover is rather....well.. awkward..." To me, whenever I see these types of covers I immediately think cliche, young adult romance, with a love triangle: standards for attracting teenage girls. Yes, this book has some of these aspects but the way it was put together didn't make it cheesy, instead a very attractive fun read.
The first connection I made about this book was the fact that the main character, Layla, in the way that she thinks, acts, talks, acts, etc., reminds of Percy Jackson. It is the oddest connection, I know, but I just feel that casual vibe throughout the book and a similarity in character. I found Layla to be very quirky and fun character. She certainly wasn't a damsel in distress (which really did surprise me ( *cough the cover)) and stood up for herself throughout the novel. There were times in which I found her to slightly gullible and illogical but I found it kind of endearing. Her little weaknesses in her character, to me, served as a reminder of who she was and the life she was born into. A too strong character/well rounded rubs off to be as perfect and Layla's quirks kept the image of her as a teenage girl enforced in my head.
One must always mention the love interests of young adult romance so here it is. The two males in the love triangle involving Layla would be Roth (Astaroth) and Zayne (good names I must say, good names). Roth is a demon, the "current" prince of demons to be exact (its explained in the book, I'd rather not spoil that part) while Zayne is a gargoyle and the childhood friend and crush of Layla. Usually I'd pinpoint exactly who I believe she is going to end up with at the end of the novel but somehow I can't say for sure with the relations between Layla and these two lovely young men. If I was to bet, it would be with Roth as that is traditional with young adult romances. We just love the handsome, dark, and dangerous type. He and Layla's got some stuff going and too be honest I liked his character. Though he falls in the handsome, dark, and dangerous category he doesn't harbor the traditional characteristics:
A. He's humorous
B. He's not moody and dark all the time (*cough Edward)
C. He acts human (not some insane superhero)
I really want to bet that Roth is who Layla ends up with but then Zayne's character is just so good. He's the classic Peeta character (Hunger Games) and genuinely wants the best for Layla yet is limited by the boundaries of the law of the Gargoyles. I believe the only reason he hasn't made a move is his strong obedience to the laws of the Gargoyles ( Layla= half demon and half Gargoyle so them going out is a big no, no ). Maybe there is a chance for the good guy to win out on this but I'm not really sure. So the point is, love triangle is not stable. Plus *big spoilers Roth has been sent to hell at the end of the last book so he's technically he's not of the picture anymore (he'll be back, I checked with the next book) and that gives Zayne time to make his move. Love triangles drive me crazy. I usually can predict but I'm still iffy about Zayne's relationship to Layla. He's older brother one minute then potential love interest next.
*Why must every YA romance contain a love triangle? Is it the new most trendy shape? Triangles? Why not love squares? Then at least everyone is happy. See humans just can't be happy without seeing someone else suffer in their happiness.
Although I this book was about Gargoyles and Demons instead of the traditional Vampire and Werewolf theme that has been really popular lately, I didn't find a change of what type of supernatural character that was featured to be relevant. Though, yes, it technically stepped outside the cliche, it wasn't that much different in feel. There was still the eternal feud between the two races due to a war of good and bad. The change was interesting and different but I feel if you switched the whole book to feature vampires and werewolves, no large difference would happen to the plot. White Hot Kiss still followed the normal pattern of these types of young adult supernatural romances.
I found this book to be a pretty good read. It was humorous, relaxing, and had surprisingly human characters (none of that since-I'm-supernatural-I-must-be-dark-and-mysterious stuff). I don't particularly think that the cover and the title of White Hot Kiss particularly suits it. I guess it would be for marketing as apparently people love these types of steamy covers and titles, but I found it to make it more cliche and sappy then the book actually was. If I was to give a rating out of five for this book, I'd give it a 3.5/5. That's not bad considering I put good at 4 and my ultra loves at 5. I would say to give this book a try. It feels different from the norm in its more human feel and non vampire/werewolf characters. It is also a fast and fun read that is sure to entertain.
Monday, March 17, 2014
Wedged Sneaker Insanity
New shoes world and I really don't know what to say about them.
They are an insane mass of studs, snakeskin, and glitter. I don't believe I have ever owned anything so decked out. I have no idea where or when I'll ever wear these bedazzled shoes (maybe to school? ) but they are very comfortable. I was very surprised by that but I can run and walk in them just fine like in any pair of regular sneaker I own. I really don't need the extra height either but, hey, I have a dream of being 5 foot 7 so an extra inch or so can't hurt.
This pair was a present from my mother which she bought for me on her recent trip to China. I'm not quite sure where you'd find a pair quite like it here in the US but well, the internet is a world of wonders.
Pair View: What studs. |
Single shoe facing outward view |
Single shoe facing inward view |
Front view |
Pair side view |
Front view. Just look at that glittered top! |
Sunday, March 16, 2014
A Childhood Brought Back
I'll admit the post was forced upon me by my sister so I'll dedicate it to her.
It is the result of a very happy and childish Saturday afternoon in which we decided that burning little pieces of wood in our backyard would be the best way to avoid studying.
It was actually really fun. We burned a couple of ants (I'm sorry world for cruel entertainment), some sticks, some leaves, and we tried to set fire to some paper but unfortunately it didn't work.. *dang it :)
Look at that smoke! *We kept a small cup of water on hand just in case we actually started a fire but unfortunately it didn't work. |
A clear picture of what we were doing :) |
Look at the smoke! There was a lot more smoke then that is pictured. It just didn't show up on camera very well. *my sister's hand btw |
More smoke! |
Holes we made! How we wished it had caught fire. |
Lilacs and Flowers!
The Lilacs Bloomed!
They're my absolute favorite blossoms as they smell the nicest.
They pictures aren't the best but the flowers are pretty!
(I have an awful of flower pics don't I... :D )
And of course they're pictures of other flowers that I happened to find pretty too.
Awkward light circle in the middle.. :) |
My Favorite Pic. of everyone I took |
Such a classic flower picture I think. |
Clover Flowers! |
And this one just looked pretty. |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)